Yeah, let’s listen to propaganda instead.

Run from that fruit of knowledge! Eden is ignorance!

LDS is a mad and evil cult

The problem with this teaching is that it tries to pull the curtain back around people’s eyes by making the issue about failings with church leaders personally. A failing on a personal level with somebody does not disprove anything he has to say. As the old adage states, “even a broken clock is right twice a day”. So that’s not the issue here.

The issue is failings with doctrine, inconsistency of doctrine, and outright falsity of doctrine, which are well supported by multiple facts and evidences, particular from the mouths of the church leaders themselves.

So saying that “some internet materials…magnify, exaggerate, and in some cases invent shortcomings of early church leaders” is true. It’s also irrelevant.

It is wrong to question, even if the questioning is true.

Lame. Way lame website!

What marvels could be accomplished if the energies put into a site like this were to go target the Butchers of the Bill of Rights in Washington D.C.? What marvels could transpire were the good web design and energies used to target the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Banking complex with its “darker side” to empire holding a “grim and tragic overlay of brutal conquest, subjugation, repression, and an astronomical cost in blood and treasure.” (Hinckley, “War and Peace,” 2003.)?

At first it wasn’t clear what I was looking at, but then the site reveals itself to be one holding that ever pompous, arrogant, self-righteous and stereotypical person who is now so “enlightened” so as to heap scorn, ridicule, and derision on the faith of their upbringing. That is all well and good. Everyone has their issues, but man, it is tired as a theme or a spirit that is associated with those who constantly keep the LDS Church in their cross hairs, ever nit picking, ever agitated, constantly seeking to take a shot at the church and its leadership. I’ve got some good friends within those ranks, and they are sweet people in many ways, but their spirit on this theme is indeed tiresome. loathsome, and reeks of a putrid malcontent that serves little if any good.

Incidentally, I came across the site looking for photographs of the LDS Church First Presidency who made this superb statement:

“We believe that our real threat comes from within and not from without, and it comes from the underlying spirit common to Naziism, Fascism, and Communism, namely, the spirit which would array class against class, which would set up a socialistic state of some sort, which would rob the people of the liberties which we possess under the Constitution, and would set up such a reign of terror as exists now in many parts of Europe. We confess to you that it has not been possible for us to unify our own people even upon the necessity of such a turning about, and therefore we cannot unfortunately, and we say it regretfully, make any practical suggestion to you as to how the nation can be turned about. Faithfully yours, /s/ Heber J. Grant, J. Reuben Clark, Jr., David O. McKay. (First Presidency letter to U.S. Treasury, September 30, 1941 AD)

I would love to see “teachings” like this put out by the makers of this website, and perhaps a good attempt to help wake up the LDS people to the fact they have mentally stoned their living prophets now for generations.

But rather than hit Babylon the Great Whore with any agitation, revealing her dark and wicked deeds as an evil police state rises, it seems there are those who “leave the church” but “can’t leave the church alone.” These “criticize the allocation of funds to which they no longer contribute.”

Do some have real issues? Causes for greif? Offense given? Do some suffer deep resentment and hurt? Oh yeah. I’m not negating that fact. The Lord himself has reason for greif that so few are open to right thinking, truth and goodness, that those professing to be Latter-day Saints have not even been willing to know, comprehend, and understand the criminal elements rising against us on all sides, and certainly rejecting prophetic warning about such.

I wonder how many close to the church itself and centered around its headquarters will be part of that murderous Judas element that will aid in the coming bloodbath that will surely take place unless there is a drastic turning about?

President Benson cites President J. Reuben Clark’s warning that, “’we stand in danger of losing our liberties, and that once lost, only blood will bring them back; and once lost, we of this church will, in order to keep the Church going forward, have more sacrifices to make and more persecutions to endure than we have yet known. . . .’ (CR, April 1944, p. 116.) He also stated that if the conspiracy ‘comes here it will probably come in its full vigor and there will be a lot of vacant places among those who guide and direct, not only this government, but also this Church of ours.’ (CR, April 1952, p. 80.) (Conference Report, April 1972, Ensign, July 1972, p. 61; as quoted in God, Family, Country, p. 323; quoted also in The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p. 107; again on pp. 658-659.)

To each his own. Surely, though, amid all that we face as society, it is my opinion that the talented creators of this site are selling themselves short on productivity and making a better contribution if they could be convinced of much weightier matters than the trite points of complaint or criticism found on these pages.